Reference Watch: Kulusevsky fortunate he prevented the pink card?

Dermot Gallagher explains the large hotspots from the weekend’s occasions and discusses whether or not Tottenham’s Dejan Kulusevski was despatched off throughout his facet’s defeat to Brighton?

Tottenham 0-1 Brighton

accident: Dejan Kulusevsky elbowed Mark Cucurella within the first half. The Tottenham striker didn’t talk with the Brighton participant. Referee Craig Pawson issued a yellow card to Kulusevsky.

Cucurella tried to wrap it up and I believe there was a response. I believe he was a really fortunate boy.

Verdict: The yellow card is the correct choice.

Dermot says: “I by no means thought, after I noticed him, that he was going to be fired. I believe he reacts actually stupidly once you have a look at him as a result of he is already taking a danger, however I believe he throws his arm again some extra in a large number. Get away from me. It isn’t thrown with an elbow stick or as a weapon, and you do not hit him within the face. It is performed with actual malice, so I assumed the yellow card was proper. I assumed the referee dominated this proper.

“Lots of people thought it was a pink card however for me, I did not suppose it was.

“He threw his arm again, he is aggressive, however I did not suppose he was violent. I believe he was fortunate. He took a giant danger, there is not any doubt about that. It is one the place it’s important to choose what the referee sees and what he does, and the VAR seemed for some time. Lengthy and felt the identical.”

accident: Enock Mwepu was strolling a tightrope after the guide himself bought right into a journey on the Sergio Reguilon and escaped a second yellow regardless of being penalized for a excessive boot towards Ben Davies and stepping on Pierre-Emile Hojbjerg’s foot with a careless defiance.

Verdict: Mwepu is fortunate to not get a second yellow card

Dermot says: “I do not suppose this can be a pink card [for Mwepu’s high boot]. They clashed however what occurs there may be if the referee took him out – as a result of he already had a yellow card at this level – and stated that is it, what occurs after a couple of minutes would have been a lot simpler for the referee.

“The one which was booked for was an identical problem to the one which was booked at Hojbjerg.

When that occurred, I assumed he’d be fired as a result of they have been the identical. I come again to the opposite one, if he had ready him, so to talk, then when the second problem got here, he would give him a second yellow card, then everybody would think twice about what Mwipo expects. He was simply warned.”

Conte: Brighton gamers deserved second place in yellow | Referees ought to ignore false accidents

Antonio Conte says referees ought to “pay extra consideration to defending gamers” and believes Brighton’s gamers “deserve a second yellow card” after Tottenham’s 1-0 house defeat.

Whereas alternatives have been restricted on both facet, there was controversy within the first half when Tottenham’s Dejan Kulusevski swing his elbow at Mark Kukurila and he was solely booked, and Enoch Mwebo, who had already been given a yellow card, escaped additional punishment when it was held. Punished for top boots on Ben Davies and standing on Pierre-Emile Hojberg’s sneakers.

Tottenham misplaced Matt Doherty this season throughout final week’s win at Aston Villa when he sustained a medial collateral ligament damage following a deal with from Mattie Money, and Conte stated officers ought to be momentarily vigil when gamers take the ball into the deal with.

“Typically I believe the referee ought to pay extra consideration to defending the gamers,” Conte stated in his post-match press convention, when requested if it was about my flip and the “massive interventions” from Brighton. “I perceive you go in and take the ball however if you happen to go take half the ball and half the physique and also you harm the participant, it will not be the identical.

“I believe for the protection of the participant, the referee has to pay quite a lot of consideration, to grasp. In case you go to take the ball however once you take the ball and the physique and also you do hurt to your opponent, I believe it’s important to make a giant penalty.

“I used to be a participant, I understand how to do it. If I wish to trigger hassle, injure the opponent, I discover the time to go for the ball and the entire physique. I used to be a participant, I do know this as an alternative, to simply take the ball, I am going with the ball … however he took the ball, Sure however he additionally broke his leg [referring to Cash]. “

When requested concerning the Kulusevsky incident, Conte stated: “Truthfully, I have not seen. I am going to see what occurred. I additionally suppose that possibly through the match different gamers may need deserved Brighton’s second yellow card. However the referee determined that means and we’ve to simply accept the referee’s choice.”

On the potential of Brighton gamers slowing down the sport on free kicks, Conte added: “These type of referees must be higher. It is regular if you happen to play and you realize you may get one level – in the long run, they get three – you perceive. Typically it’s important to lose the depth of the match and the participant lie nonetheless. However I believe the referees should attempt to preserve going and never break the depth of the match with pretend accidents.”

Newcastle 2-1 Leicester

accident: After the guests didn’t clear a nook kick for Jongo Shelvey, Bruno Guimaraes managed to push the ball twice towards the aim on the again publish, his second try rolling by way of Kasper Schmeichel’s legs.

Referee Jared Gillette initially penalized Guimarães for a foul, however a VAR evaluation decided that Leicester goalkeeper Schmeichel didn’t have the ball in his arms and the choice was correctly overturned because the Foxes conceded a free kick for the seventeenth time this season.

Verdict: The precise choice. Wonderful use of VAR expertise.

This can be a nice use of VAR expertise.

Dermot says: “Very cool use of VAR. The referee feels that the goalkeeper is holding the ball together with his hand, which he doesn’t. He makes a mistake, however if you happen to have a look at this clearly there isn’t any mistake. Once more, the goalkeeper performs the function of a defender. He didn’t go to make use of his arms, he went To make use of his toes.I let the ball go, the goalkeeper went to make use of his toes like a fullback and if you happen to cope with a fullback that means and also you rating, you anticipate a aim, that is the principle situation for me.

“The VAR was actually good as a result of when it occurred the aim was instantly disallowed. The VAR instantly stated to not restart as a result of I have to verify it. He checked out it a number of occasions and there was no error. The referee goes and appears on the display screen as a result of within the opinion of the referee Video plugin, no error.

“It was a superb workforce course of.”